MECHANISMS OF FORMATION OF INTEGRITY AND ANTI-CORRUPTION CULTURE IN PENITENTIARY INSTITUTIONS
Author (s): Anishchenko V., Tkachenko O., Razumeiko N.
Work place:
Anishchenko V.,
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor,
Head of the Department of Formation
and Development of Professional Competence
of Personnel of the State Criminal-Executive
Service of Ukraine,
Institute of Professional Development,
Penitentiary Academy of Ukraine,
Chernihiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-5062-3789;
Tkachenko O.,
PhD in Law, Associate Professor,
Chief Research Fellow of the Department
of Applied Research on Prison Management
of the Research Center of Penitentiary
and Criminal Justice of the Educational and Scientific
Institute of Law, Law Enforcement Activities and Psychology,
Penitentiary Academy of Ukraine,
Chernihiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-5640-0906;
Razumeiko N.,
PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor,
Head of the Specialized Training Center,
Penitentiary Academy of Ukraine,
Chernihiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0003-0801-3490
Language: Ukrainian
Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. 2026. № 1 (19): 156–165
https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2026.01.156
The article addresses the urgent problem of corruption prevention in the activities of the State Criminal Executive Service (SCES) of Ukraine. It is stated that under the conditions of European integration and martial law, traditional administrative and punitive methods of fighting corruption have exhausted their effectiveness. This necessitates the search for new tools aimed at changing the value orientations of staff and forming a rejection of corruption at the mental level. The aim of the study is to determine, classify, and scientifically substantiate effective mechanisms for forming integrity and anti-corruption culture among SCES staff based on the analysis of empirical barriers and considering modern global practices. The study is based on the analysis of empirical survey results, which revealed critical obstacles to integrity. It was established that the dominant factors of corruption risks are economic pressure (95.5% of respondents cite low salaries as a cause of corruption) and psychological barriers (fear of exposure and distrust in the protection system – willingness to report violations is only 15–20%). The necessity of a strategic shift from the compliance model (formal adherence to rules under the threat of punishment) to the integrity-based model, which relies on internal moral convictions, is substantiated. A comprehensive system of mechanisms for forming anti-corruption culture is proposed, including: 1) educational-training component (learning based on ethical dilemmas); 2) institutional component (creation of independent reporting channels and real protection of whistleblowers); 3) psychological component (staff support and development of ethical leadership). It is proven that the formation of integrity is not only a legal but also a managerial and pedagogical task, and the implementation of the proposed mechanisms will contribute to increasing institutional trust and strengthening the human potential of the penitentiary system.
Key words: integrity, anti-corruption culture, SCES of Ukraine, integrity-based model, whistleblowers, professional training, penitentiary staff.
References
- Kyselov, D. V. (2024), “Administrative and legal regulation of ethical behavior of the personnel of the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine”, Scientific perspectives, No. 4 (46), pp. 950–960.
- Tkachenko, O. H., Olefir, L. I. and Barakhta, V. V. (2025), “Corruption risks in the activities of rank-and-file and senior staff of the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine”, Scientific notes. Series: Law, Iss. 18, pp. 209–214.
- Ukraine (2014), On Prevention of Corruption: Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/1700-18#Text (accessed 10 December 2025).
- Tkachenko, O. H., Razumeiko, N. S. and Olefir, L. I. (2025), “Professional training of the personnel of the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine as a key factor in ensuring the effectiveness of its work”, Successes and Achievements in Science, No. 2 (12), pp. 219–227.
Read more